From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FT1QE-0002r3-4M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:47:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FT1QB-0002qF-Jz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:47:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FT1QB-0002qA-Ct for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:47:31 -0400 Received: from [193.252.22.26] (helo=smtp5.wanadoo.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FT1Ur-0004s8-VM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:52:22 -0400 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0501.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 28BE21C0011A for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:47:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ANice-251-1-91-245.w86-219.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.219.82.245]) by mwinf0501.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F2FE61C0008E for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:47:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <443AA820.2000206@wanadoo.fr> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:46:56 +0200 From: Laurent Desnogues MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SPARC target : Fix carry flag update inaddxcc and subxc References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Blue Swirl a =E9crit : >> Doesn't this condition in addx and the corresponding line in subx need= =20 >> similar >> treatment? >=20 > They don't change the flags. ADDX (now named ADDC in v9) doesn't change the flags, while ADDXcc (ADDCcc) does. The cc versions also compute overflow. cf. SPARC v9 on www.sparg.org Laurent