From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXKpY-0007gp-4Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:19:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXKpW-0007gR-Mt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:19:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXKpW-0007gO-HF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:19:30 -0400 Received: from [24.93.47.44] (helo=ms-smtp-05.texas.rr.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FXKrK-0002Lt-QQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:21:23 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (cpe-67-9-160-120.austin.res.rr.com [67.9.160.120]) by ms-smtp-05.texas.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3MGJSx1019651 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:19:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <444A578E.6000702@austin.rr.com> Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:19:26 -0500 From: Lonnie Mendez MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Large USB patch References: <4447E811.1040403@gmx.de> <4448F1F6.4090609@austin.rr.com> <4448FF3F.3030009@austin.rr.com> <44490614.50406@austin.rr.com> <44490852.2080608@gmx.de> <44491659.30804@austin.rr.com> <44491F0A.2090608@austin.rr.com> <444926AC.3070104@austin.rr.com> <44494596.3070808@austin.rr.com> <4449F860.1060809@gmx.de> <444A3F7E.6070107@austin.rr.com> <444A5336.4040102@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <444A5336.4040102@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org nix.wie.weg@gmx.de wrote: >In which case did it not work, when I test it, it is functioning (only >with libusb) >usb_add host:04b6x0005 > Sorry about that. I was used to the previous syntax: usb_add host:04b6:0005 My guess is that the new syntax is to distinguish it from the busaddr:addr syntax? It would seem checking for length would differentiate the two in that case. For the linux guest problem which distro is being used?