From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZUJb-00021H-Nq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:51:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZUJZ-0001yk-R4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:51:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZUJZ-0001yb-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:51:25 -0400 Received: from [64.233.182.191] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZUMj-0002i6-3m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:54:41 -0400 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c31so1638453nfb for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44522BFB.8030109@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:51:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix overflow conditions for MIPS add / subtract References: <443E9D2F.5050807@mail.berlios.de> <20060428132818.GA27384@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060428132818.GA27384@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dirk Behme Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I haven't tested the patched qemu, but I did test the expressions > themselves in standalone code, and they definitely do not detect > overflow. Maybe you can test Ralf's alternative proposal http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-02/msg00154.html as well? Thanks Dirk