From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fq98n-0001Pj-5A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:41:09 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fq98j-0001Jj-2M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:41:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fq98i-0001Jb-Nf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:41:04 -0400 Received: from [32.97.182.141] (helo=e1.ny.us.ibm.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fq9Hf-0005K2-UQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:50:20 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5DDf2eL009343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:41:03 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/NCO/VER7.0) with ESMTP id k5DDf2pk068290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:41:02 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5DDf1IT008704 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:41:01 -0400 Received: from [9.76.24.72] (sig-9-76-24-72.mts.ibm.com [9.76.24.72]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5DDf1EO008684 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:41:01 -0400 Message-ID: <448EC067.5050707@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:40:55 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] "invisible wall" patch References: <200606131046.40921.jseward@acm.org> <448E9032.6030401@nl.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <448E9032.6030401@nl.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Eric Hameleers wrote: > Julian Seward wrote: > > Also, VNC > functionality is still basically where it was when it was added to > QEMU - which is barely above useable status. What functionality are you referring to? Regards, Anthony Liguori > I liked the functionality > offered by the libvncserver patch better but can no longer apply that. > Is someone going to take up adding the missing pieces to VNC > functionality? The suggested patch in > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-05/msg00142.html > might help here, too. > > Eric > >