From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FqZIA-00049G-7f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:36:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FqZI9-00048S-Iw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:36:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqZI9-000486-Bt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:36:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.41.67] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FqZRM-0006X7-P4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:46:04 -0400 Received: from [84.96.92.60] (helo=Smtp.neuf.fr) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FqZI8-0002g5-HZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:36:32 -0400 Received: from [84.102.211.151] by sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006)) with ESMTP id <0J0V00FMV0YGVEU1@sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:08:21 +0200 From: Fabrice Bellard Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] -redir revisited In-reply-to: Message-id: <44904285.8020704@bellard.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE References: <15BBCEEB-3503-4AFC-9211-182CFE9B7B1E@cordney.com> <449015BD.5020609@bellard.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Korthaus?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Ren=E9 Korthaus wrote: >=20 > Am 14.06.2006 um 15:57 schrieb Fabrice Bellard: >=20 >> Hi, >> >> The current behaviour of QEMU seems correct to me: TCP connections= =20 >> coming localhost are seen coming from 10.0.2.2 on the guest. Your = =20 >> problem may be related to an incorrect Apache configuration. Did I= =20 >> miss something ? >=20 >=20 > No, Apache is configured correctly. The same with sshd, i can only = =20 > connect to the guest by applying the patch. Network configuration i= s =20 > given by Qemu DHCP. Without the patch the host simply gets no answe= r =20 > from the guest service. >=20 > Maybe this is Mac OS X specific? You should launch a tcpdump inside the guest OS and look at the IP= =20 addresses associated to the IP packets when you do a telnet from the= =20 host on the redirected host port. In any case, the patch you indicate is incorrect (our_addr is an IP= =20 address on the host network, not on the guest network), so a better= =20 solution must be found. Fabrice.