qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
	seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 03/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:42:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <449ae7ff-d815-e863-1d53-c701ce6c0a18@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ce19a3d-7b5a-1449-10c2-ee63c1471537@redhat.com>


On 4/27/23 19:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 25/04/2023 18.14, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> On interception of STSI(15.1.x) the System Information Block
>> (SYSIB) is built from the list of pre-ordered topology entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   MAINTAINERS                     |   1 +
>>   include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h |  24 +++
>>   include/hw/s390x/sclp.h         |   1 +
>>   target/s390x/cpu.h              |  72 ++++++++
>>   hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c         |  13 +-
>>   target/s390x/kvm/cpu_topology.c | 308 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c          |   5 +-
>>   target/s390x/kvm/meson.build    |   3 +-
>>   8 files changed, 424 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 target/s390x/kvm/cpu_topology.c
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index bb7b34d0d8..de9052f753 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1659,6 +1659,7 @@ M: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>   S: Supported
>>   F: include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>>   F: hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> +F: target/s390x/kvm/cpu_topology.c
>
> It's somewhat weird to have one file "cpu-topology.c" (in hw/s390x, 
> with a dash), and one file cpu_topology.c (in target/s390x, with an 
> underscore) ... could you come up with a better naming? Maybe call the 
> new file stsi-topology.c or so?


If I keep the two files (see answer to your comments on patch 2) then 
yes I can change it to stsi-topology.c,


>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> index bb7cfb0cab..9f97989bd7 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> @@ -561,6 +561,25 @@ typedef struct SysIB_322 {
>>   } SysIB_322;
>>   QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB_322) != 4096);
>
>
> Maybe add a short comment here what MAG stands for (magnitude fields?)?


Yes, in fact Magnitude bytes.


>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG  6
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG6 0
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG5 1
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG4 2
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG3 3
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2 4
>> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1 5
>> +/* Configuration topology */
>> +typedef struct SysIB_151x {
>> +    uint8_t  reserved0[2];
>> +    uint16_t length;
>> +    uint8_t  mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG];
>> +    uint8_t  reserved1;
>> +    uint8_t  mnest;
>> +    uint32_t reserved2;
>> +    char tle[];
>> +} SysIB_151x;
>> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB_151x) != 16);
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/cpu_topology.c 
>> b/target/s390x/kvm/cpu_topology.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..86a286afe2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/cpu_topology.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>> +/*
>> + * QEMU S390x CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022,2023
>> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "cpu.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
>> +#include "hw/sysbus.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/sclp.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * fill_container:
>> + * @p: The address of the container TLE to fill
>> + * @level: The level of nesting for this container
>> + * @id: The container receives a uniq ID inside its own container
>
> s/uniq/unique/


yes, thanks,

regards,

Pierre


>
>  Thomas
>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-28 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-25 16:14 [PATCH v20 00/21] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 01/21] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-27  8:04   ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:27     ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03  9:36     ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03  9:54       ` Thomas Huth
2023-05-03 11:17     ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-02 12:05   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-02 13:48     ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-03  7:23       ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 02/21] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-04-27 13:38   ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:35     ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03  9:12       ` Thomas Huth
2023-05-03 10:23         ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-06-21 13:48           ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-02 12:30   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-03  7:21     ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 11:23       ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 03/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-04-27 17:01   ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:42     ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-05-02 17:22   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-03  8:43     ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 13:01       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 04/21] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 05/21] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 06/21] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-05-04 11:03   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-05  9:34     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 07/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 08/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 19:42   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09  8:50     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 09/21] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-06-12  7:55   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-06-21 12:50     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 10/21] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 19:49   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09  8:40     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 11/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 21:47   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09 12:31     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 12/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-05-10 12:04   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-12 11:56     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 13/21] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 14/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:38   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 11:58     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 15/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarisation Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:45   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 13:01     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 16/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:47   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 13:22     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 17/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 18/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 19/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 20/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 21/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology query-cpu-polarization Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=449ae7ff-d815-e863-1d53-c701ce6c0a18@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).