From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FuxtQ-00064T-2M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:41:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FuxtP-00063s-Ji for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:41:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FuxtP-00063d-BW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:41:11 -0400 Received: from [84.96.92.55] (helo=smtP.neuf.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fuy5M-0000H7-3M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:53:32 -0400 Received: from [86.73.70.206] by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006)) with ESMTP id <0J1H00I6RHPI4DA1@sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:17:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:17:30 +0200 From: Fabrice Bellard Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Pending MIPS patches In-reply-to: <449FFEB2.1070305@gmail.com> Message-id: <44A040DA.2050108@bellard.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <449EB5FA.6070405@gmail.com> <449EBC39.3050701@bellard.org> <449FFEB2.1070305@gmail.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Dirk Behme wrote: > Fabrice Bellard wrote: > >>> 2. [PATCH][MIPS] add "lwu" instruction >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-04/msg00326.html >> >> >> >> On which MIPS CPU is it defined ? Need to track instruction sets >> exactly to be able to select a given MIPS CPU at compile time or >> dynamically. >> >>> 3. [PATCH] Add special MIPS multiply instructions >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-04/msg00375.html >> >> >> >> Same remark. > > > These are NEC VR54xx specific extensions to the MIPS instruction set. > > They are used if you use GCC's -march=vr5400 option. See > > www.necelam.com/docs/files/1375_V2.pdf > > as well. Can you add some kind of define or dynamic processor definnition in your patch so that we can keep track of the exact instruction set ? Fabrice.