From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G43cL-0001uB-7G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:37:09 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G43cJ-0001tz-NM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:37:08 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G43cJ-0001tw-Hw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:37:07 -0400
Received: from [64.233.182.185] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G43co-0002cE-Q5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:37:38 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so945195nfc
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <44C1570D.3090401@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:37:01 +0300
From: =?UTF-8?B?TGluYXMgxb12aXJibGlz?= <0x0007@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Re: QEMU GUI-Frontend based on Libvert API
References: <44C11ED6.3090006@opensourcedemo.com>	<pan.2006.07.21.19.21.20.193026@codemonkey.ws>	<44C131F1.4090408@gmail.com>	<pan.2006.07.21.20.57.32.585730@codemonkey.ws>	<44C143E9.6030806@gmail.com>
	<pan.2006.07.21.22.01.25.134356@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <pan.2006.07.21.22.01.25.134356@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Anthony Liguori wrote:

> Look at the archives from the 16th.  Fabrice hasn't said yet whether he
> likes this approach.  He also hasn't said he dislikes it though :-)

I looked trough the GUI part of the patch and this seems to be what I
have always missed in QEMU. Great, really.