From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G9lN4-0005es-If for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 12:20:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G9lN4-0005dk-25 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 12:20:58 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9lN3-0005db-NK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 12:20:57 -0400 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G9lR6-0000ZS-92 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 12:25:08 -0400 Message-ID: <44D616FD.30504@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 18:21:17 +0200 From: Oliver Gerlich MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ?off? ide/code editor under linux References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NyOS schrieb: > Hi! > > I think it might be a bit offtopic here, but I'm already on the list, > and I'm interested in some experienced users' opinion. > I can find ads on google, but not experience. > > I'm looking for a good IDE (or just a good code editor) under linux. > My first try was kdevelop approx. 3 years ago (2.2.2 version). It was > too complicated. 3.x.x is a bit unstable. > Vi is unconfortable for me, > I prefer using pico and gnu nano, but it's too stupid for some tasks. kdevelop is quite nice, but has some bugs, and shortcomings. If you're looking just for an editor, I would recommend kate (which I use for daily work, whenever I don't need a big IDE). It can be extended with plugins and scripts, so maybe you could write a script to do the template stuff. Also, AFAIK Gnome's gedit can be extended with Python scripts, which might be even better than the shell script / C++ plugin solution of kate. Regards, Oliver -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE1hb7TFOM6DcNJ6cRAu4QAJ9Xu2TKuri9Uv//p+3kj1zrLEFsQgCgjQnH y8FFrBhPJw4gFGk7E3YgCCc= =Z+Bp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----