From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GDbjH-0005Vn-UZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:51:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GDbjF-0005Vb-8m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:51:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GDbjF-0005VX-0c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:51:45 -0400 Received: from [66.249.92.172] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GDbpf-0004Ug-Hk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:58:23 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id s2so478573uge for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44E411FC.3000503@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:51:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Wrong reset of MIPS hflags EXL after interrupt? References: <44E3500A.4050608@gmail.com> <20060816182908.GC6387@networkno.de> <44E37D8E.3050801@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dirk Behme Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marius Groeger Marius Groeger wrote: > I agree, though, that in your debugging, you probably examined a wrong > context. The actual, current context's EXL should be correct, otherwise > things wouldn't be working at all. Argh, debugging different context sounds nice ;) It's my feeling that while switching between these different context anything with hflags goes wrong. But I'm only guessing here. Let's see... > Having said that, I'm currently playing with nested interrupts - let's see > how that checks out... :-) Do several consecutively, non nested, interrupts (e.g. priodical timer) work for you? Cheers Dirk