From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GFF3S-0001KA-VI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:03:22 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GFF3N-00018Q-7P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:03:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFF3N-00018H-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:03:17 -0400 Received: from [12.7.175.14] (helo=mx2.palmsource.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GFFAo-0001vw-C6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:10:58 -0400 Message-ID: <44EA036D.7070407@palmsource.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:03:09 -0700 From: "K. Richard Pixley" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Are the new arm targets working? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Are the new arm targets, versatile[ap]b expected to be working? On ubuntu-5, building 0.8.2 yields a binary which can run the other two targets, but which hangs after printing the monitor prompt on either of these. --rich (apologies if you see this twice. I thought I sent it last week, but I didn't see it echoed back.)