From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GFGxs-0003e6-JP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:05:44 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GFGxs-0003dZ-6c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:05:44 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFGxs-0003dW-15
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:05:44 -0400
Received: from [84.96.92.55] (helo=smtP.neuf.fr)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GFH5K-0006Ab-Nm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:13:26 -0400
Received: from [84.102.211.58] by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld
	(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006))
	with ESMTP id <0J4D001MK8T8S3E0@sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:55:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:56:15 +0200
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] windows xp under pclinuxos 2005
In-reply-to: <44E9D35F.4080104@xtal.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-id: <44EA1DEF.6070103@bellard.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <20060820181501.11663156090@pc42.xtal.rwth-aachen.de>
	<44E9D35F.4080104@xtal.rwth-aachen.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Jan Marten Simons wrote:

> I was asking for an integrated virtual FTP server (about 14 months ago). 
> [snipped]

My preference would be for an SMB server or NFS server fully integrated 
in slirp.

A fully integrated NFS server would be quite simple to implement but it 
would not easily work with windows guests.

At first glance, by looking at the smbfs code in the Linux kernel, an 
SMB server compatible with Linux guests would be as easy to write as an 
NFS server. But being compatible with Windows guests would be more 
difficult and might lead to a rewrite of Samba !

Regards,

Fabrice.