From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHpbL-0008CP-Fr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:29:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHpbK-0008C5-Ku for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:29:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHpbK-0008C2-Hk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:29:02 -0400 Received: from [84.96.92.55] (helo=smtP.neuf.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GHpkN-0006GT-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:38:23 -0400 Received: from [84.102.211.32] by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006)) with ESMTP id <0J4Q008EEBSDK5K0@sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:29:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:29:24 +0200 From: Fabrice Bellard Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] future OS X support In-reply-to: <03F371C7-69F2-4205-BD1C-E18FA42AA9AB@kberg.ch> Message-id: <44F36E44.4000300@bellard.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <03F371C7-69F2-4205-BD1C-E18FA42AA9AB@kberg.ch> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: mike.kronenberg@kberg.ch Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, Mike Kronenberg wrote: > @Fabrice > How are your plans about supporting OS X in the future? > > We, for our part, are eager to push dev on OS X: > - with the patches of Gwenole and pbrook, qemu 0.8.2 builds great on OS > X ppc and intel (gcc4). All tests are OK. Maybe I can merge part of it if the changes are not too intrusive ? > - I'm willing to rewrite my OS X block.c patches for hardware CD-ROM > support. OK. > - I've just written a complete new cocoa frontend based on Anthony > shmem patches (quartz and openGL). (only problem is the 4mb limit on OS > X atm) Good. Why is cocoa.m not sufficient ? > - There are some other small patches like basic bootorder support that > are ready, too. This one will be merged ASAP. > As qemu was one of the first usable emulators on OS X, it is still > widely used and known. > Things even look like we get included on the C'T disk next month IMHO, you should concentrate on porting kqemu on Mac OS X. I don't think it should be more more complicated than the other ports. I can provide support for that if someone if motivated. With kqemu you would be able to compete with the other (and more expensive !) virtualizers... Regards, Fabrice.