qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iotests: make meson aware of individual I/O tests
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:30:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44d571e7-05b6-b2a1-7eb7-44bf2912ec69@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230302184606.418541-1-berrange@redhat.com>

On 02/03/2023 19.46, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> To just repeat the patch 5 description...
> 
> Currently meson registers a single test that invokes an entire group of
> I/O tests, hiding the test granularity from meson. There are various
> downsides of doing this
> 
>   * You cannot ask 'meson test' to invoke a single I/O test
>   * The meson test timeout can't be applied to the individual
>     tests
>   * Meson only gets a pass/fail for the overall I/O test group
>     not individual tests
>   * If a CI job gets killed by the GitLab timeout, we don't
>     get visibility into how far through the I/O tests
>     execution got.
> 
> This is not really specific to the I/O tests, the problem is common
> to any case of us running a test which is in fact another test
> harness which runs many tests. It would be nice to have meson have
> the full view of all tests run. Adapting the I/O tests is as easy
> win in this respect.
> 
> This switches meson to perform test discovery by invoking 'check' in
> dry-run mode. It then registers one meson test case for each I/O
> test. Parallel execution remains disabled since the I/O tests do not
> use self contained execution environments and thus conflict with
> each other.

Great to see some movement in this area again!

Some questions/remarks:

1) Could you remove tests/check-block.sh now? See also:
    https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220209101530.3442837-9-thuth@redhat.com/

2) With regards to parallel execution ... I think it should be
    possible nowadays - the "check" script is normally also run
    with the "-j" switch by the tests/check-block.sh script, so
    if you remove the possibility to run in parallel, it's a
    regression from the previous behavior!

3) When I tried this last year, I had a weird problem that
    the terminal sometimes gets messed up ... I wasn't able
    to track it down back then - could you check by running
    "make check-block" many times (>10 times) to see whether
    it happens with your series or not?

  Thomas



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-03  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-02 18:46 [PATCH 0/5] iotests: make meson aware of individual I/O tests Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] iotests: explicitly pass source/build dir to 'check' command Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 12:55   ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-03 13:01     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] iotests: allow test discovery before building Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03  8:14   ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 12:56   ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] iotests: strip subdir path when listing tests Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 12:58   ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] iotests: print TAP protocol version when reporting tests Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03  8:17   ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 12:58   ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] iotests: register each I/O test separately with meson Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03  9:34   ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 10:21     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 18:54 ` [PATCH 0/5] iotests: make meson aware of individual I/O tests Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03  8:30 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-03-03  8:53   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03  9:39     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 10:27     ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 10:45   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 13:06     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 15:49       ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 15:52         ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44d571e7-05b6-b2a1-7eb7-44bf2912ec69@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).