From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMXI-00044u-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:52:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMXG-00044N-If for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:52:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMXG-00044J-By for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:52:30 -0400 Received: from [12.7.175.14] (helo=mx2.palmsource.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GTMcc-00011Z-BY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:58:02 -0400 Message-ID: <451D5D58.3090701@palmsource.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:52:24 -0700 From: "K. Richard Pixley" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm is a shared library? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org When I build qemu-0.8.2, qemu-arm is a shared library rather than being an executable. This seems highly suspicious and makes it particularly difficult to debug. What's the rationale behind this? --rich