From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.1] file-posix: Mitigate file fragmentation with extent size hints
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:12:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <451ed32d-72e8-0238-8793-f5a80ae991c4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200707161741.GG7002@linux.fritz.box>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4136 bytes --]
On 07.07.20 18:17, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 07.07.2020 um 16:23 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
>> Espeically when O_DIRECT is used with image files so that the page cache
>> indirection can't cause a merge of allocating requests, the file will
>> fragment on the file system layer, with a potentially very small
>> fragment size (this depends on the requests the guest sent).
>>
>> On Linux, fragmentation can be reduced by setting an extent size hint
>> when creating the file (at least on XFS, it can't be set any more after
>> the first extent has been allocated), basically giving raw files a
>> "cluster size" for allocation.
>>
>> This adds an create option to set the extent size hint, and changes the
>> default from not setting a hint to setting it to 1 MB. The main reason
>> why qcow2 defaults to smaller cluster sizes is that COW becomes more
>> expensive, which is not an issue with raw files, so we can choose a
>> larger file. The tradeoff here is only potentially wasted disk space.
>>
>> For qcow2 (or other image formats) over file-posix, the advantage should
>> even be greater because they grow sequentially without leaving holes, so
>> there won't be wasted space. Setting even larger extent size hints for
>> such images may make sense. This can be done with the new option, but
>> let's keep the default conservative for now.
>>
>> The effect is very visible with a test that intentionally creates a
>> badly fragmented file with qemu-img bench (the time difference while
>> creating the file is already remarkable) and then looks at the number of
>> extents and the take a simple "qemu-img map" takes.
>>
>> Without an extent size hint:
>>
>> $ ./qemu-img create -f raw -o extent_size_hint=0 ~/tmp/test.raw 10G
>> Formatting '/home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw', fmt=raw size=10737418240 extent_size_hint=0
>> $ ./qemu-img bench -f raw -t none -n -w ~/tmp/test.raw -c 1000000 -S 8192 -o 0
>> Sending 1000000 write requests, 4096 bytes each, 64 in parallel (starting at offset 0, step size 8192)
>> Run completed in 25.848 seconds.
>> $ ./qemu-img bench -f raw -t none -n -w ~/tmp/test.raw -c 1000000 -S 8192 -o 4096
>> Sending 1000000 write requests, 4096 bytes each, 64 in parallel (starting at offset 4096, step size 8192)
>> Run completed in 19.616 seconds.
>> $ filefrag ~/tmp/test.raw
>> /home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw: 2000000 extents found
>> $ time ./qemu-img map ~/tmp/test.raw
>> Offset Length Mapped to File
>> 0 0x1e8480000 0 /home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw
>>
>> real 0m1,279s
>> user 0m0,043s
>> sys 0m1,226s
>>
>> With the new default extent size hint of 1 MB:
>>
>> $ ./qemu-img create -f raw -o extent_size_hint=1M ~/tmp/test.raw 10G
>> Formatting '/home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw', fmt=raw size=10737418240 extent_size_hint=1048576
>> $ ./qemu-img bench -f raw -t none -n -w ~/tmp/test.raw -c 1000000 -S 8192 -o 0
>> Sending 1000000 write requests, 4096 bytes each, 64 in parallel (starting at offset 0, step size 8192)
>> Run completed in 11.833 seconds.
>> $ ./qemu-img bench -f raw -t none -n -w ~/tmp/test.raw -c 1000000 -S 8192 -o 4096
>> Sending 1000000 write requests, 4096 bytes each, 64 in parallel (starting at offset 4096, step size 8192)
>> Run completed in 10.155 seconds.
>> $ filefrag ~/tmp/test.raw
>> /home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw: 178 extents found
>> $ time ./qemu-img map ~/tmp/test.raw
>> Offset Length Mapped to File
>> 0 0x1e8480000 0 /home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw
>>
>> real 0m0,061s
>> user 0m0,040s
>> sys 0m0,014s
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>
> I also need to squash in a few trivial qemu-iotests updates, for which I
> won't send a v2:
The additional specifications in 243 make it print a warning on tmpfs
(because the option doesn’t work there). I suppose the same may be true
on other filesystems as well. Should it be filtered out?
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-07 14:23 [PATCH for-5.1] file-posix: Mitigate file fragmentation with extent size hints Kevin Wolf
2020-07-07 14:47 ` Eric Blake
2020-07-07 16:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-07-10 16:12 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2020-07-13 9:08 ` Max Reitz
2020-07-13 13:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-07-13 13:45 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=451ed32d-72e8-0238-8793-f5a80ae991c4@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).