From: "K. Richard Pixley" <rich.pixley@palmsource.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question?
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:32:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <452D2AA5.4000404@palmsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F78187B88633A12B4AF4E0FF140@phx.gbl>
Blue Swirl wrote:
> BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
> purposes. It could be unlike any existing hardware, for example with
> zero or thousands of registers. The problem would be making a compiler
> for the CPU, also porting some OS to it. Any GCC and Linux guru
> volunteers? CS research projects?
This idea has been around for a long time. When I was in school, one of
our projects was to build a processor for such an architecture. The
idea has been kicked around the gnu development toolchain community for
some time as well.
Gcc is sexy. You shouldn't have any trouble finding a student or
another volunteer who's interested in implementing a simple, relatively
orthogonal instruction set.
Gas is harder. It's not so sexy. Nor is ld, nor gdb.
Porting linux at that point is pretty much just a matter of determining
cpu start and load addresses.
Note: mmu management would also be a modest task, either to implement or
to circumvent.
--rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-11 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-10 16:40 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question? Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 17:55 ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-10 18:59 ` WaxDragon
2006-10-10 19:10 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 20:34 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-10 20:44 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 22:00 ` Marco Matthies
2006-10-11 2:39 ` Paul Brook
2006-10-11 12:05 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-11 17:20 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-11 17:32 ` K. Richard Pixley [this message]
2006-10-11 17:32 ` Marco Matthies
2006-10-11 18:04 ` Brian Wheeler
2006-10-11 19:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-10-11 19:38 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-11 20:02 ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-13 22:31 ` Paul Brook
2006-10-14 8:14 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-14 14:11 ` Paul Brook
2006-10-10 23:51 ` Aurelien Jarno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-11 21:03 Ben Taylor
2006-10-11 22:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=452D2AA5.4000404@palmsource.com \
--to=rich.pixley@palmsource.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).