From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GYTWO-0001zL-3b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:20:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GYTWL-0001xy-Vu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:20:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYTWL-0001xq-SX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:20:41 -0400 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GYTer-0006V5-7J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:29:29 -0400 Message-ID: <452FF426.3010909@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:16:38 +0200 From: Martin Bochnig MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question.. References: <12993045.1160767103427.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml08.mgt.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <12993045.1160767103427.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml08.mgt.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Ben Taylor wrote: >As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running >binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. > > > My answer had been a bit longer: "Read ld.so.1(1) i.e. # man ld.so.1 Then: *One* option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially $LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 [not required])."