Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Hello

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Hello

[Eric Lowe]

>please ask Eric Lowe.
>I did not prepare the x64/x86 stuff.
>And the sdl amd64 bit patch is also from him.

The SDL patch is from Juergen Zimmermann.

I have not had any problems building 64-bit using --prefix /wherever/i/please to both QEMU and SDL's configure scripts; note that adding wherever libSDL winds up ($PFX/bin) to your PATH prior to configuring QEMU is a requirement so that QEMU will link to the right spot....

- Eric

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Hello

[Martin Bochnig]

Eric Lowe wrote:

>>please ask Eric Lowe.
>>I did not prepare the x64/x86 stuff.
>>And the sdl amd64 bit patch is also from him.
>>    
>>

Before I finally go:

I just learned, that the term "stuff" has a negative side-meaning:
http://dict.tu-chemnitz.de/dings.cgi?lang=en&service=en-de&opterrors=0&optpro=0&query=stuff&dlink=self&comment=
That was by no means my intention !
Further: I didn't mention, that Eric Lowe is the guy, who ported the
BSD-kqemu-wrapper to Solaris x86 and x64.

Cool!
Well done !!

-martin

>
>The SDL patch is from Juergen Zimmermann.
>
>I have not had any problems building 64-bit using --prefix /wherever/i/please to both QEMU and SDL's configure scripts; note that adding wherever libSDL winds up ($PFX/bin) to your PATH prior to configuring QEMU is a requirement so that QEMU will link to the right spot....
>
>- Eric
>

[Qemu-devel] Re: Hello

[Martin Bochnig]

Ishwar Rattan wrote:

>
>
> I think the SDL source I downloaded is already prepatched.
> See the diff file below: my assumption is that --- indicates the
> original file and +++ the patched version (I might be wrong
> here). So, line in file with - in first column is reference to
> original file and is to be replaced by with line with + in
> first column.


Hi,

please ask Eric Lowe.
I did not prepare the x64/x86 stuff.
And the sdl amd64 bit patch is also from him.
The diff is not very big, that's true.
But it is not zero, I don't know.
I didn't build sdl for x64 so far.

I'm mostly "the sparc guy".
I had been busy all week long in improving the src to better support
sparc-hosts.
Therefore didn't I come to amd64 so far, while I do intend to asap.

See my diff from yesterday (which is meanwhile totally obsolete again) :

http://www.martux.org/qemu/qemu-0.8.2-solaris__20061010x11.gdiff

Pls. gimme time until I throw the sparc pkg out before I can deeper look
into amd64-HOST support.


Thanks,
Martin

>
> diff -ur SDL-1.2.11.orig/configure SDL-1.2.11.jnz/configure
> --- SDL-1.2.11.orig/configure Tue Jun 27 06:48:54 2006
> +++ SDL-1.2.11.jnz/configure Mon Sep 4 15:28:28 2006
> @@ -33170,10 +33170,10 @@
>
> if test "x$enable_rpath" = "xyes"; then
> if test $ARCH = bsdi -o $ARCH = freebsd -o $ARCH = irix -o $ARCH =
> linux -o $ARCH = netbsd; then
> - SDL_RLD_FLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,\${exec_prefix}/lib"
> + SDL_RLD_FLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,\${libdir}"
> fi
> ...
> -->> In configure file (of source distribution):
> Lines around 33170+ already have the replacement done?
>
> # Set runtime shared library paths as needed
>
> if test "x$enable_rpath" = "xyes"; then
> if test $ARCH = bsdi -o $ARCH = freebsd -o $ARCH = irix -o $ARCH =
> linux -o $ARCH = netbsd; then
> SDL_RLD_FLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,\${libdir}"
> fi
> if test $ARCH = solaris; then
> ...
>
> I am stumped by why the compiled binaries do not work. This is the
> limit of my expertise. Can I find pre-patched SDL-1.2.11 source
> somewhere?
>
>
> Regards,
> -ishwar
>
>