From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GazUp-0005bY-Td for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GazUo-0005Ze-9Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GazUn-0005ZM-VI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:30 -0400 Received: from [12.7.175.14] (helo=mx2.palmsource.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GazUo-0003Sv-20 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:30 -0400 Message-ID: <45391B22.1050608@palmsource.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:53:22 -0700 From: "K. Richard Pixley" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Could someone please explain the issue with gcc4, please? Or point me to an existing explanation? I mean, I understand that qemu is believed to be building incorrectly with gcc4. But what is the failure mode folks have been seeing? And what's being done about it or what needs to be done about it? Is this an issue for all targets or is it x86 specific? Thanks, --rich