From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GgKVj-0001TW-5W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:20:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GgKVh-0001Qi-FE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:20:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GgKVh-0001QQ-73 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:20:29 -0500 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GgKVg-0004yI-RM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:20:29 -0500 Message-ID: <454C8589.4090904@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 13:20:25 +0100 From: Oliver Gerlich MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Anyone knows why some mails get stuck at lists.gnu.org? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: webmasters@gnu.org Hello, apparently today another load of delayed mails appeared on the qemu-devel list... I have experienced this delay myself with some mails I sent (OTOH the last mail I sent appeared after just 20 minutes). So I wonder if anyone knows why some mails are delayed so much? The mail headers look like this: ... Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GgCp2-0007R5-Cz for olig9@gmx.de; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 23:07:56 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GeYNY-0007fP-0O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:44:44 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GeYNS-0007f4-1o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:44:42 -0500 ... So it seems the mails are stuck at lists.gnu.org . Any idea what's causing this or how to get rid of the delay? Thanks, Oliver Gerlich