From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GoZQ9-0005sH-Sv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:52:50 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GoZQ6-0005q1-Og for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:52:48 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GoZQ6-0005pk-H4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:52:46 -0500 Received: from [66.249.92.174] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GoZQ6-0002as-Di for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:52:46 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so891030ugd for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:52:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <456A7FD0.5070403@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:04:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] A cumulative MIPS patchset References: <20061121144037.GD12745@networkno.de> <20061121164600.GA25749@farad.aurel32.net> <20061126022216.GB11000@networkno.de> In-Reply-To: <20061126022216.GB11000@networkno.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dirk Behme Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>I suggest to use the patch below instead. It is based on the patch I >>posted [1] on the mailing list a few days ago. it moves the >>initialisation of the RTC date/time into hw/mc146818rtc.c, to avoid >>duplication of code. I guess all platform using this RTC chip will want >>to setup at least the date and time. > > I included it in my current mips patchset, available from > http://people.debian.org/~ths/qemu/2006-11-26/ I saw no other comments on the list, so any chance to get this patchset applied? Dirk