Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] pc-dimm: factor out MemoryDevice

[Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>]

Hi Igor,

> 
> > Right now we can only map PCDIMM/NVDIMM into guest address space. In the
> > future, we might want to do the same for virtio devices - e.g.
> > virtio-pmem or virtio-mem. Especially, they should be able to live side
> > by side to each other.
> > 
> > E.g. the virto based memory devices regions will not be exposed via ACPI
> > and friends. They will be detected just like other virtio devices and
> > indicate the applicable memory region. This makes it possible to also use
> > them on architectures without memory device detection support (e.g. s390x).
> > 
> > Let's factor out the memory device code into a MemoryDevice interface.
> A couple of high level questions as relevant code is not here:
> 
>   1. what would hotplug/unplug call chain look like in case of virtio-pmem
>   device
>      (reason I'm asking is that pmem being PCI device would trigger
>       PCI bus hotplug controller and then it somehow should piggyback
>       to Machine provided hotplug handlers, so I wonder what kind of
>       havoc it would cause on hotplug infrastructure)

For first phase we are using 'virtio-pmem' as cold added devices. AFAIU
'VirtioDeviceClass' being parent class and 'hotplug/unplug' methods implemented 
for virtio-pmem device. So, pci bus hotplug/unplug should call the corresponding
functions?

> 
>   2. why not use PCI bar mapping mechanism to do mapping since pmem is PCI
>   device?

I think even we use if as PCI BAR mapping with PCI we still need free guest physical 
address to provide to VM for mapping the memory range. For that there needs to 
be coordination between PCDIMM and VIRTIO pci device? Also, if we use RAM from QEMU 
address space tied to big region(system_memory) memory accounting gets easier and at single place.

Honestly speaking I don't think there will be much difference between the two approaches? unless
I am missing something important?

> 
>  
> > v2 -> v3:
> > - "pc-dimm: factor out MemoryDevice interface"
> > --> Lookup both classes when comparing (David Gibson)
> > 
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Fix compile issues on ppc (still untested  )
> > 
> > 
> > David Hildenbrand (3):
> >   pc-dimm: factor out MemoryDevice interface
> >   machine: make MemoryHotplugState accessible via the machine
> >   pc-dimm: factor out address space logic into MemoryDevice code
> > 
> >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c                         |   3 +-
> >  hw/i386/pc.c                                 |  24 ++-
> >  hw/mem/Makefile.objs                         |   1 +
> >  hw/mem/memory-device.c                       | 282
> >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  hw/mem/pc-dimm.c                             | 304
> >  +++++++--------------------
> >  hw/ppc/spapr.c                               |  24 ++-
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c                         |   1 +
> >  include/hw/boards.h                          |  16 ++
> >  include/hw/mem/memory-device.h               |  48 +++++
> >  include/hw/mem/pc-dimm.h                     |  26 +--
> >  numa.c                                       |   3 +-
> >  qmp.c                                        |   4 +-
> >  stubs/Makefile.objs                          |   2 +-
> >  stubs/{qmp_pc_dimm.c => qmp_memory_device.c} |   4 +-
> >  14 files changed, 465 insertions(+), 277 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 hw/mem/memory-device.c
> >  create mode 100644 include/hw/mem/memory-device.h
> >  rename stubs/{qmp_pc_dimm.c => qmp_memory_device.c} (61%)
> > 
> 
> 
>