From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H122t-0007Fg-O1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:52:19 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H122s-0007Eb-UW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:52:19 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H122s-0007EA-LM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:52:18 -0500
Received: from [213.133.111.57] (helo=bugaboo.mu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1H122s-000673-9R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:52:18 -0500
Message-ID: <4597CE9C.5060509@bluegap.ch>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:52:12 +0100
From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] time inside qemu
References: <459540A8.8020209@uab.cat>
	<200612291743.05983.paul@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <200612291743.05983.paul@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E0rius_Mont=F3n?= <marius.monton@uab.cat>

Hi,

Paul Brook wrote:
> qemu is not cycle accurate or even deterministic.

Is there anything that's cycle accurate at all?

Regards

Markus