From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] ARRAY_SIZE: check that argument is an array
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:00:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <459939cd-4f0e-bc08-7de8-5788e6f2e2aa@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170120000636-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1858 bytes --]
On 01/19/2017 04:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> +#define QEMU_IS_ARRAY(x) (!__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), \
>>> + typeof(&(x)[0])))
>>> #ifndef ARRAY_SIZE
>>> -#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
>>> +#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
>>> + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(!QEMU_IS_ARRAY(x)))
>>
>> We've got some double-negation going on here ("cause a build bug if the
>> negation of QEMU_IS_ARRAY() is not 0") which takes some mental
>> gymnastics, but it is the correct result. [I kind of like that gnulib
>> uses positive logic in its 'verify(x)' meaning "verify that x is true,
>> or cause a build error"; compared to the negative logic in the kernal
>> 'BUILD_BUG_ON[_ZERO](x)' meaning "cause a build bug if x is non-zero" -
>> but that's personal preference and not something for qemu to change]
>
> I can rename QEMU_IS_ARRAY to QEMU_IS_PTR and reverse the logic - would
> this be preferable?
No, that's worse. As written, "cause a build bug if x is not an array"
is easier than "cause a build bug if x is a pointer", because now you
are missing an implicit "(instead of the intended array)". Keep it the
way you have it. I guess it's the _ZERO as a suffix that's throwing me;
a better name might have been QEMU_ZERO_OR_BUILD_BUG_ON(x) ("give me a
zero expression, or a build bug if x is non-zero") rather than
QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO (my first read was "give me a build bug if x is
zero", but a better read is "give me a build bug if x is not zero, else
give me x because it is zero") - but our choice of naming in patch 3/4
mirrors the kernel naming, so it's not worth changing.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-19 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-19 21:07 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] ARRAY_SIZE fixups Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-19 21:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] compiler: drop ; after BUILD_BUG_ON Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-19 21:22 ` Eric Blake
2017-01-19 21:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] compiler: rework BUG_ON using a struct Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-19 21:26 ` Eric Blake
2017-01-20 7:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-01-20 7:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-01-20 16:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-20 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 17:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-20 18:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-01-20 9:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-01-20 14:36 ` Eric Blake
2017-01-20 14:53 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-01-19 21:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] compiler: expression version of QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-19 21:28 ` Eric Blake
2017-01-19 21:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] ARRAY_SIZE: check that argument is an array Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-19 21:59 ` Eric Blake
2017-01-19 22:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-19 23:00 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-01-20 7:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-01-20 12:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-20 7:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] ARRAY_SIZE fixups Markus Armbruster
2017-01-20 14:57 ` no-reply
2017-01-20 15:15 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459939cd-4f0e-bc08-7de8-5788e6f2e2aa@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=serge.fdrv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).