From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6X6n-0005f6-GX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:03:05 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6X6m-0005eT-5d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:03:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6X6l-0005eF-UC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:03:03 -0500 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H6X6l-0001Ws-7J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:03:03 -0500 Message-ID: <45ABCFE0.7060609@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:02:56 +0100 From: Oliver Gerlich MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de: http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680 Also on Slashdot: http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml And the original news: http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/News Anyone knows more about this? How is it in direct comparison with Qemu? Regards, Oliver Gerlich -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFq8/dTFOM6DcNJ6cRAgHBAKDL2XckliKhrrpPs14IT6UXz6WceQCgyfmt tCOSicFzFJ/Q2TxWjoRjJu0= =LUth -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----