From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Make removing IOHandlers safe from within an IOHandler
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:54:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45E07BC9.1080209@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 506 bytes --]
I was getting random SEGVs when disconnecting from the VNC server. I
tracked it down to the fact that if you remove a IOHandler from another
IOHandler, all sorts of badness may result as you're removing entries
from a linked list while transversing it.
My solution is to simply add a deleted flag to each entry and walk the
list a second time. During the second transversal, we'll remove nodes
that need removing.
Haven't seen the SEGV since I started using this patch.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
[-- Attachment #2: iohandler-remove.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2123 bytes --]
diff -r 5f92961f382b vl.c
--- a/vl.c Thu Feb 22 01:48:01 2007 +0000
+++ b/vl.c Sat Feb 24 11:51:00 2007 -0600
@@ -4462,6 +4462,7 @@ typedef struct IOHandlerRecord {
IOCanRWHandler *fd_read_poll;
IOHandler *fd_read;
IOHandler *fd_write;
+ int deleted;
void *opaque;
/* temporary data */
struct pollfd *ufd;
@@ -4487,8 +4488,7 @@ int qemu_set_fd_handler2(int fd,
if (ioh == NULL)
break;
if (ioh->fd == fd) {
- *pioh = ioh->next;
- qemu_free(ioh);
+ ioh->deleted = 1;
break;
}
pioh = &ioh->next;
@@ -6157,7 +6157,7 @@ void qemu_system_powerdown_request(void)
void main_loop_wait(int timeout)
{
- IOHandlerRecord *ioh, *ioh_next;
+ IOHandlerRecord *ioh;
fd_set rfds, wfds, xfds;
int ret, nfds;
struct timeval tv;
@@ -6192,6 +6192,8 @@ void main_loop_wait(int timeout)
FD_ZERO(&wfds);
FD_ZERO(&xfds);
for(ioh = first_io_handler; ioh != NULL; ioh = ioh->next) {
+ if (ioh->deleted)
+ continue;
if (ioh->fd_read &&
(!ioh->fd_read_poll ||
ioh->fd_read_poll(ioh->opaque) != 0)) {
@@ -6219,9 +6221,11 @@ void main_loop_wait(int timeout)
#endif
ret = select(nfds + 1, &rfds, &wfds, &xfds, &tv);
if (ret > 0) {
- /* XXX: better handling of removal */
- for(ioh = first_io_handler; ioh != NULL; ioh = ioh_next) {
- ioh_next = ioh->next;
+ IOHandlerRecord **pioh;
+
+ for(ioh = first_io_handler; ioh != NULL; ioh = ioh->next) {
+ if (ioh->deleted)
+ continue;
if (FD_ISSET(ioh->fd, &rfds)) {
ioh->fd_read(ioh->opaque);
}
@@ -6229,6 +6233,17 @@ void main_loop_wait(int timeout)
ioh->fd_write(ioh->opaque);
}
}
+
+ /* remove deleted IO handlers */
+ pioh = &first_io_handler;
+ while (*pioh) {
+ ioh = *pioh;
+ if (ioh->deleted) {
+ *pioh = ioh->next;
+ qemu_free(ioh);
+ } else
+ pioh = &ioh->next;
+ }
}
#if defined(CONFIG_SLIRP)
if (slirp_inited) {
next reply other threads:[~2007-02-24 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-24 17:54 Anthony Liguori [this message]
2007-02-24 18:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Make removing IOHandlers safe from within an IOHandler Daniel P. Berrange
2007-02-24 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][UPDATE] " Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45E07BC9.1080209@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).