From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com,
clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 14:22:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45bb29fcb3629a857577e50378adab1f5598644e.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2c502ca-2a1f-d29f-8931-4be7389557ee@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 10:21 +0100, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
> On 2/2/23 17:42, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 14:20 +0100, Pierre Morel wrote:
> > > The topology information are attributes of the CPU and are
> > > specified during the CPU device creation.
> > >
> > > On hot plug we:
> > > - calculate the default values for the topology for drawers,
> > > books and sockets in the case they are not specified.
> > > - verify the CPU attributes
> > > - check that we have still room on the desired socket
> > >
> > > The possibility to insert a CPU in a mask is dependent on the
> > > number of cores allowed in a socket, a book or a drawer, the
> > > checking is done during the hot plug of the CPU to have an
> > > immediate answer.
> > >
> > > If the complete topology is not specified, the core is added
> > > in the physical topology based on its core ID and it gets
> > > defaults values for the modifier attributes.
> > >
> > > This way, starting QEMU without specifying the topology can
> > > still get some advantage of the CPU topology.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 24 +++
> > > hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 23 ++-
> > > hw/s390x/meson.build | 1 +
> > > 4 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> > >
[...]
> >
> > > +/**
> > > + * s390_set_core_in_socket:
> > > + * @cpu: the new S390CPU to insert in the topology structure
> > > + * @drawer_id: new drawer_id
> > > + * @book_id: new book_id
> > > + * @socket_id: new socket_id
> > > + * @creation: if is true the CPU is a new CPU and there is no old socket
> > > + * to handle.
> > > + * if is false, this is a moving the CPU and old socket count
> > > + * must be decremented.
> > > + * @errp: the error pointer
> > > + *
> > > + */
> > > +static void s390_set_core_in_socket(S390CPU *cpu, int drawer_id, int book_id,
> >
> > Maybe name it s390_(topology_)?add_core_to_socket instead.
>
> OK, it is better
>
> >
> > > + int socket_id, bool creation, Error **errp)
> > > +{
> > > + int old_socket = s390_socket_nb(cpu);
> > > + int new_socket;
> > > +
> > > + if (creation) {
> > > + new_socket = old_socket;
> > > + } else {
> >
> > You need parentheses here.
> >
> > > + new_socket = drawer_id * s390_topology.smp->books +
> > (
> > > + book_id * s390_topology.smp->sockets +
> > )
> > > + socket_id;
>
> If you prefer I can us parentheses.
It's necessary, otherwise the multiplication of book_id and smp->sockets takes precedence.
>
>
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Check for space on new socket */
> > > + if ((new_socket != old_socket) &&
> > > + (s390_topology.cores_per_socket[new_socket] >=
> > > + s390_topology.smp->cores)) {
> > > + error_setg(errp, "No more space on this socket");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Update the count of cores in sockets */
> > > + s390_topology.cores_per_socket[new_socket] += 1;
> > > + if (!creation) {
> > > + s390_topology.cores_per_socket[old_socket] -= 1;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > >
[...]
> >
> > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> > > index f3cc845d3b..9bc51a83f4 100644
> > > --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> > > +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> > > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> > > #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
> > > #include "migration/blocker.h"
> > > #include "qapi/visitor.h"
> > > +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
> > >
> > > static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
> > >
> > > @@ -310,10 +311,18 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > > {
> > > MachineState *ms = MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
> > > S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(dev);
> > > + ERRP_GUARD();
> > >
> > > g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
> > > ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
> > >
> > > + if (s390_has_topology()) {
> > > + s390_topology_set_cpu(ms, cpu, errp);
> > > + if (*errp) {
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (dev->hotplugged) {
> > > raise_irq_cpu_hotplug();
> > > }
> > > @@ -551,11 +560,21 @@ static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)
> > > sizeof(CPUArchId) * max_cpus);
> > > ms->possible_cpus->len = max_cpus;
> > > for (i = 0; i < ms->possible_cpus->len; i++) {
> > > + CpuInstanceProperties *props = &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props;
> > > +
> > > ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].type = ms->cpu_type;
> > > ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].vcpus_count = 1;
> > > ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id = i;
> > > - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.has_core_id = true;
> > > - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.core_id = i;
> > > +
> > > + props->has_core_id = true;
> > > + props->core_id = i;
> > > + props->has_socket_id = true;
> > > + props->socket_id = i / ms->smp.cores;
> > > + props->has_book_id = true;
> > > + props->book_id = i / (ms->smp.cores * ms->smp.sockets);
> > > + props->has_drawer_id = true;
> > > + props->drawer_id = i /
> > > + (ms->smp.cores * ms->smp.sockets * ms->smp.books);
> >
> > You need to calculate the modulus like in s390_topology_cpu_default, right?
>
> !!! yes of course, good catch, I forgot that.
>
> Since there are two uses of this calculation, what about using inlines?
> like:
Fine by me, I just have no idea what std is short for.
Since this would be used in s390_topology_cpu_default and calculates the default assignment,
I would call it s390_topology_cpu_default_socket, book, etc. or similar
>
> static inline int s390_std_socket(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> {
> return (n / smp->cores) % smp->sockets;
> }
>
> static inline int s390_std_book(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> {
> return (n / (smp->cores * smp->sockets)) % smp->books;
> }
>
> static inline int s390_std_drawer(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> {
> return (n / (smp->cores * smp->sockets * smp->books)) % smp->books;
> }
>
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 13:20 [PATCH v15 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 01/11] s390x/cpu topology: adding s390 specificities to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 10:44 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-02 13:15 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 16:05 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-03 9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-08 17:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 14:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 16:42 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-03 9:21 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 13:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-02-03 14:40 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 15:38 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 03/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 17:36 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 10:06 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 10:32 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 11:24 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:57 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-09 16:39 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 14:16 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 04/11] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 10:13 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 10:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 05/11] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:05 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:50 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 17:52 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 9:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 10:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 12:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 13:37 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 14:08 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 06/11] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 13:02 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 18:34 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 9:59 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 11:27 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 13:03 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 07/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 13:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 08/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: x-set-cpu-topology monitor command Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:03 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 14:59 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 18:40 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 13:14 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 09/11] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:12 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:41 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-06 13:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-07 10:10 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:16 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 18:26 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-08 9:11 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 10/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARITY_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 17:35 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 10:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-09 11:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-09 12:12 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 12:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
[not found] ` <87y1p8q7v6.fsf@pond.sub.org>
2023-02-09 12:28 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 13:00 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-09 14:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 11/11] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 16:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 17:14 ` [PATCH v15 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 13:23 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45bb29fcb3629a857577e50378adab1f5598644e.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).