qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC
@ 2007-04-01 17:02 Aurelien Jarno
  2007-04-01 17:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap forunaligned PC Blue Swirl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2007-04-01 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

Hi all,

According to the SPARCv8 and SPARCv9 manuals, the jmpl, rett and return
instructions should generate a mem_address_not_aligned trap if either
of the low-order two bits of the target address is nonzero.

The patch below implements that.

Bye,
Aurelien


Index: target-sparc/cpu.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/target-sparc/cpu.h,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -d -p -r1.32 cpu.h
--- target-sparc/cpu.h	1 Apr 2007 15:15:36 -0000	1.32
+++ target-sparc/cpu.h	1 Apr 2007 16:51:22 -0000
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #define TT_NFPU_INSN 0x04
 #define TT_WIN_OVF  0x05
 #define TT_WIN_UNF  0x06 
+#define TT_UNALIGNED 0x07 
 #define TT_FP_EXCP  0x08
 #define TT_DFAULT   0x09
 #define TT_TOVF     0x0a
@@ -55,6 +56,7 @@
 #define TT_DFAULT   0x30
 #define TT_DMISS    0x31
 #define TT_DPROT    0x32
+#define TT_UNALIGNED 0x34
 #define TT_PRIV_ACT 0x37
 #define TT_EXTINT   0x40
 #define TT_SPILL    0x80
Index: target-sparc/op.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/target-sparc/op.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -d -p -r1.27 op.c
--- target-sparc/op.c	1 Apr 2007 15:38:17 -0000	1.27
+++ target-sparc/op.c	1 Apr 2007 17:01:15 -0000
@@ -1486,7 +1486,10 @@ void OPPROTO op_movl_npc_im(void)
 
 void OPPROTO op_movl_npc_T0(void)
 {
-    env->npc = T0;
+    if (T0 & 0x3)
+	raise_exception(TT_UNALIGNED);
+    else
+	env->npc = T0;
 }
 
 void OPPROTO op_mov_pc_npc(void)

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap forunaligned PC
  2007-04-01 17:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC Aurelien Jarno
@ 2007-04-01 17:15 ` Blue Swirl
  2007-04-01 17:30   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC Aurelien Jarno
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Blue Swirl @ 2007-04-01 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: aurelien; +Cc: qemu-devel

>According to the SPARCv8 and SPARCv9 manuals, the jmpl, rett and return
>instructions should generate a mem_address_not_aligned trap if either
>of the low-order two bits of the target address is nonzero.

This is true, but in that case alignment should be enforced for loads ands 
stores as well. The checks also incur a performance penalty for little 
advantage. Maybe the checks should be enabled only with a compile/run-time 
option.

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC
  2007-04-01 17:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap forunaligned PC Blue Swirl
@ 2007-04-01 17:30   ` Aurelien Jarno
  2007-04-01 20:26     ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC and load/store Aurelien Jarno
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2007-04-01 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Blue Swirl; +Cc: qemu-devel

Blue Swirl a écrit :
>> According to the SPARCv8 and SPARCv9 manuals, the jmpl, rett and return
>> instructions should generate a mem_address_not_aligned trap if either
>> of the low-order two bits of the target address is nonzero.
> 
> This is true, but in that case alignment should be enforced for loads ands 
> stores as well. The checks also incur a performance penalty for little 
> advantage. Maybe the checks should be enabled only with a compile/run-time 
> option.
> 

I also have a patch for load/store, but openbios is doing a few
unaligned memory accesses, so the patch can't be used until openbios is
fixed.

I haven't made any benchmark, but the performance penality is probably
very small. If you look at softmmu_template.h, you will see that it only
adds a if test, while the whole function is already a few dozen of lines
long.

I would really like to see the QEMU having the same behaviour as real
hardware, this allow for example debugging SIGBUS problems in a program
without having real hardware.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC and load/store
  2007-04-01 17:30   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC Aurelien Jarno
@ 2007-04-01 20:26     ` Aurelien Jarno
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2007-04-01 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Blue Swirl; +Cc: qemu-devel

On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 07:30:40PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Blue Swirl a écrit :
> >> According to the SPARCv8 and SPARCv9 manuals, the jmpl, rett and return
> >> instructions should generate a mem_address_not_aligned trap if either
> >> of the low-order two bits of the target address is nonzero.
> > 
> > This is true, but in that case alignment should be enforced for loads ands 
> > stores as well. The checks also incur a performance penalty for little 
> > advantage. Maybe the checks should be enabled only with a compile/run-time 
> > option.
> > 
> 
> I also have a patch for load/store, but openbios is doing a few
> unaligned memory accesses, so the patch can't be used until openbios is
> fixed.
> 

I have finally been able to found and fix the bug in openbios. I have
send a patch to the openbios mailing list. The patch and the fixed bios
is available on http://temp.aurel32.net .

The patch below is for QEMU and implements mem_address_not_aligned for 
unaligned PC (jmpl, rett and return instructions) and for load/store
operations.

I will try to do some benchmarks about the performance penality, but I
think it is very small. The patch basically adds 2 or 3 host assembly
instructions for each load/store, jmpl, rett or return instruction.


Index: target-sparc/cpu.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/target-sparc/cpu.h,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -d -p -r1.32 cpu.h
--- target-sparc/cpu.h	1 Apr 2007 15:15:36 -0000	1.32
+++ target-sparc/cpu.h	1 Apr 2007 19:26:57 -0000
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #define TT_NFPU_INSN 0x04
 #define TT_WIN_OVF  0x05
 #define TT_WIN_UNF  0x06 
+#define TT_UNALIGNED 0x07 
 #define TT_FP_EXCP  0x08
 #define TT_DFAULT   0x09
 #define TT_TOVF     0x0a
@@ -55,6 +56,7 @@
 #define TT_DFAULT   0x30
 #define TT_DMISS    0x31
 #define TT_DPROT    0x32
+#define TT_UNALIGNED 0x34
 #define TT_PRIV_ACT 0x37
 #define TT_EXTINT   0x40
 #define TT_SPILL    0x80
Index: target-sparc/op.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/target-sparc/op.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -d -p -r1.27 op.c
--- target-sparc/op.c	1 Apr 2007 15:38:17 -0000	1.27
+++ target-sparc/op.c	1 Apr 2007 19:26:57 -0000
@@ -1486,7 +1486,10 @@ void OPPROTO op_movl_npc_im(void)
 
 void OPPROTO op_movl_npc_T0(void)
 {
-    env->npc = T0;
+    if (T0 & 0x3)
+	raise_exception(TT_UNALIGNED);
+    else
+	env->npc = T0;
 }
 
 void OPPROTO op_mov_pc_npc(void)
Index: target-sparc/op_helper.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/target-sparc/op_helper.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -d -p -r1.23 op_helper.c
--- target-sparc/op_helper.c	1 Apr 2007 15:15:36 -0000	1.23
+++ target-sparc/op_helper.c	1 Apr 2007 19:26:57 -0000
@@ -872,7 +872,10 @@ void do_interrupt(int intno)
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) 
 
+static void do_unaligned_access (target_ulong addr, int is_write, int is_user, void *retaddr);
+
 #define MMUSUFFIX _mmu
+#define ALIGNED_ONLY
 #define GETPC() (__builtin_return_address(0))
 
 #define SHIFT 0
@@ -887,6 +890,11 @@ void do_interrupt(int intno)
 #define SHIFT 3
 #include "softmmu_template.h"
 
+static void do_unaligned_access (target_ulong addr, int is_write, int is_user, void *retaddr)
+{
+	/* Comment the following line to disable mem_address_not_aligned traps */
+	raise_exception(TT_UNALIGNED);
+}
 
 /* try to fill the TLB and return an exception if error. If retaddr is
    NULL, it means that the function was called in C code (i.e. not
Index: target-sparc/translate.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/target-sparc/translate.c,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -d -p -r1.44 translate.c
--- target-sparc/translate.c	1 Apr 2007 16:23:36 -0000	1.44
+++ target-sparc/translate.c	1 Apr 2007 19:26:57 -0000
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
    Rest of V9 instructions, VIS instructions
    NPC/PC static optimisations (use JUMP_TB when possible)
    Optimize synthetic instructions
-   Optional alignment check
    128-bit float
 */

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-01 20:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-01 17:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC Aurelien Jarno
2007-04-01 17:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap forunaligned PC Blue Swirl
2007-04-01 17:30   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC Aurelien Jarno
2007-04-01 20:26     ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][SPARC] mem_address_not_aligned trap for unaligned PC and load/store Aurelien Jarno

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).