From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HY6Rw-0002EK-7J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:14:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HY6Ru-0002Bw-6L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:14:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HY6Ru-0002Bb-3b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:14:50 -0400 Received: from farad.aurel32.net ([82.232.2.251] helo=mail.aurel32.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HY6Ow-0004hy-7G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:11:46 -0400 Message-ID: <461011FF.1020407@aurel32.net> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:11:43 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Sparc32/64 emulation test report References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blueswir1@hotmail.com Blue Swirl a écrit : > Sparc32 system emulator tests > For your information I recently tried to build gcc 4.1 in bootstrap mode on both QEMU and real hardware (SparcStation 4) for C, C++, objc and fortran. I than run the testsuite. The testsuite gave identical results on both emulated and real hardware. More impressive the binaries (including all .o files) in the build tree were the same, minor strings containing hostname and date/time. I used an SVN version of QEMU plus a few patches that have been applied since then, except the std/stda in delay slot one. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net