From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HfZFM-000281-BI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:24:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HfZFJ-00026v-Fg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:24:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfZFH-00026S-Mk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:24:40 -0400 Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.82]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HfZ9z-00016B-T0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:19:12 -0400 Message-ID: <462B368B.4010205@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:18:51 +0200 From: Werner Dittmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu / KQemu on 64-bit (x86_64) host systems References: <46231BEB.5070402@t-online.de> <46251321.5050803@t-online.de> <46267504.5080101@t-online.de> <462789D3.9030202@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: balrogg@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Andrzej, implemented the patch, works ok even if I removed the notsc parameter from the kernel parameter line. I did some tests with the systems, compiled quite some code - works great. I didn't make any performance tests to compare the solutins - but it looks ok preformace wise. (This is a 64bit host and a 32bit guest). Regards, Werner andrzej zaborowski wrote: > On 19/04/07, Werner Dittmann wrote: >> Andrzej, >> > > That's a deficiency of the kqemu approach and it's not correct because > an AMD X2 4200+ is not emulated. Your virtual machine is *not* your > PC. > > Have you tried the patch btw? > > Regards, > Andrzej > > >