From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HqA87-0007gh-IG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 11:49:03 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HqA85-0007fv-VJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 11:49:03 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HqA85-0007fl-LF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 11:49:01 -0400
Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11] helo=mail.wrs.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jason.wessel@windriver.com>) id 1HqA85-0001x5-2w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 11:49:01 -0400
Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144])
	by mail.wrs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4LFmwRk000967
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 21 May 2007 08:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4651BF78.3000000@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:49:12 -0500
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] MIPS64 problem with ethernet
References: <4651B40F.3000704@windriver.com> <4651BD4D.9020008@aurel32.net>
In-Reply-To: <4651BD4D.9020008@aurel32.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Jason Wessel a =E9crit :
>  =20
>> The ethernet device does not come up correctly on a 64 MIPS target wit=
h=20
>> a 64 bit kernel.
>>    =20
>
> Which Ethernet card are you using? The pcnet one is working correctly
> here. I am using a 2.6.21.1 kernel.
>
>  =20
It works perfectly fine if I boot a 32bit kernel on the 64bit mips qemu=20
with the pcnet32.  It is when I boot the 64bit kernel on the 64bit mips=20
qemu that I see the issue.  The only difference I can see is the math=20
operations in the kcalloc() inline because the sizes are different in 32=20
vs 64 of course.  I too was using a 2.6.21.1 kernel with mips.org=20
patches.  Likely that I am using a different compiler though.  Keeping=20
in mind that the same kernel 32bit and 64bit kernels works fine on real=20
hardware.

Jason.