From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw0M3-0004Co-Gm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:35:35 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw0M2-0004As-RB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:35:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw0M2-0004AL-JJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:35:34 -0400 Received: from farad.aurel32.net ([82.232.2.251] helo=mail.aurel32.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hw0M2-00009h-4u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:35:34 -0400 Received: from volta.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:216:d3ff:fe17:fd00]) by mail.aurel32.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hw0Lw-0000Un-RX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:35:28 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=aurel32) by volta.aurel32.net with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hw0Lw-00057U-Gl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:35:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4666FE70.8070309@aurel32.net> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:35:28 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Sparc32 network problems References: <5C0D359E-F154-4E86-8BCF-72EBF9A27EEA@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Blue Swirl a écrit : > On 6/6/07, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Using Q 0.9.0d88 on a Mac OS X i386 host I was able to boot into >>> debian-40r0-sparc-netinst.iso with qemu-system-sparc, have the NIC >>> configured through DHCP and install to about 73% where I repeatedly >>> got a kernel panic "Aiee". >> I should add that when I tried the interrupt checking patch proposed >> on this list (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-03/ >> msg00153.html) then instead of the kernel panic I got a qemu crash. > > Would this happen to be the same bug as in this report: > http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=117768736212439&w=2 I don't think so, this bug has already been fixed in the CVS. Or maybe it is back. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net