From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IES8z-0001yd-M8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:54:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IES8x-0001wf-Tu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:54:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IES8x-0001wa-QG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:54:19 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IES8x-0001MT-CT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:54:19 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so695360uge for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46AA142D.1000300@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:50:05 +0200 From: Sunil Amitkumar Janki MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: QEMU Automated Testing (was [Qemu-devel] qemu Makefile.target vl.h hw/acpi.c hw/adlib.c ...) References: <1175990048.1516.77.camel@rapid> <20070408000420.GJ21953@networkno.de> <1176018595.1516.115.camel@rapid> <20070408144103.GM21953@networkno.de> <1176049887.1516.209.camel@rapid> <000c01c77a1e$8bc6d620$a3548260$@com> <20070727142142.GX8527@erizo.shearer.org> <46AA0137.8060007@codemonkey.ws> <20070727143404.GA16020@erizo.shearer.org> <46AA080B.9040902@gmail.com> <20070727151211.GE16020@erizo.shearer.org> In-Reply-To: <20070727151211.GE16020@erizo.shearer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Dan Shearer wrote: > You do also have the architectures provided to you by QEMU :-) :-) > I have been able to build modular Xorg for Armedslack in QEMU without having the hardware but when I tried to port Slackware 12.0 to SPARC in QEMU I found it was way too slow and started looking for some real hardware. Maybe in the future where we have all kinds of cheap multicore processors this will not matter much but for the moment limited resources are still some kind of hindrance to realizing the benefits of multi-architecture emulation. Maybe I should trade in my single-core Athlon system for some serious quadcore x86_64 chip but I'd rather wait for 16-core Loongson 3 :-).