From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRqYv-0000tY-HM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:36:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRqYk-0000sE-V6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:36:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRqYk-0000sB-QZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:36:18 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRqYX-0001MJ-DV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:36:18 -0400 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w8so1526421mue for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 07:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46DAC99D.2090402@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:33:01 +0200 From: Ronald MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sparc32 networking working? References: <46DAC7BE.5070209@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <46DAC7BE.5070209@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Robert Reif schreef: > I'm trying to use sparc32 on linux i686 RH9 and am unable to > to get this working with current CVS. My old scripts that > didn't set any networking options no longer work. When > running a debian sparc netinst cd the setup finds a dhcp > connection but is unable to connect to the internet. > > Adding -user to the command line causes it to output this: > Invalid vlan (0) with no nics > > Adding -nic lance to the command line cause it to output this: > qemu-system-sparc: invalid option -- '-nic' > > Any idea on what to do next. If I remember correctly, the > last time I tried this (a few months ago) I was able to successfully > do a debian network install. > > > > Did you try bridging to a non-virtual network? I had some problems too when I did not use an alternative network setup.