From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZuh3-0006L8-QO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:38:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZuh2-0006Jm-F2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:38:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZuh2-0006JV-7O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:38:12 -0400 Received: from sp604001mt.neufgp.fr ([84.96.92.60] helo=Smtp.neuf.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IZuh1-0002Uu-Sw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:38:12 -0400 Received: from [86.73.70.210] by sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JOW00DXA3XOYUL2@sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:37:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:36:34 +0200 From: Fabrice Bellard Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu monitor.c In-reply-to: Message-id: <46F81FD2.9050506@bellard.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, I don't think this is the right fix because the monitor expressions can be used for either virtual or physical addresses. I suggest using 64 bit integers for every target. Fabrice. Blue Swirl wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/qemu > Module name: qemu > Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/09/24 18:39:04 > > Modified files: > . : monitor.c > > Log message: > Fix >4G physical memory dump for Sparc32 > > CVSWeb URLs: > http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qemu/monitor.c?cvsroot=qemu&r1=1.81&r2=1.82 > > > >