From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IbcYN-0004rW-PM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:40:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IbcYK-0004oL-58 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:40:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbcYK-0004oG-0l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:40:16 -0400 Received: from il.qumranet.com ([82.166.9.18]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IbcYJ-0006ys-G3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:40:15 -0400 Message-ID: <46FE55B5.8040100@qumranet.com> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:40:05 +0200 From: Izik Eidus MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Updated >2G memory patch References: <46FE5431.4080409@qumranet.com> In-Reply-To: <46FE5431.4080409@qumranet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Blue Swirl Izik Eidus wrote: > Blue Swirl wrote: > > cpu_register_physical_memory(0x100000000, above_bios_mem_size, > ram_addr + ram_size); > should be > cpu_register_physical_memory(0x100000000, above_bios_mem_size, > ram_size); sorry, in qemu cvs cpu_register_physical_memory(0x100000000, above_bios_mem_size, ram_addr + ram_size); should be kept cpu_register_physical_memory(0x100000000, above_bios_mem_size, ram_addr + ram_size); :)