From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DUt9G-0002xb-1Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 17:17:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DUt98-0002tl-3l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 17:17:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DUt97-0002eJ-Hm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 17:17:05 -0400 Received: from [64.233.184.192] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DUt7r-0000Bd-4j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 17:15:47 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so1483374wra for ; Sun, 08 May 2005 14:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46d6db66050508140926756245@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:09:46 +0200 From: Christian MICHON Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux 2.6.10 ? In-Reply-To: <200505081753.j48HrB510389@hofr.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050508162550.GC23071@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <200505081753.j48HrB510389@hofr.at> Reply-To: Christian MICHON , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org for me it's working on a XP host with qemu 0.7.0. I can see the ouput errors on the serial console of qemu. Neat :) I just miss a initrd... I've been compiling 2.6.x guests since qemu 0.6.0, and the only pb I have are regarding stable framebuffer switching. It works on the host but not always inside qemu :( Christian On 5/8/05, Der Herr Hofrat wrote: > > > > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/QEMU/ > > > just grabed the bzImage from your web-page and checked what it does - sam= e > behavior the only output is a single line: >=20 > (qemu) >=20 > I noticed that you had a number of patches in that directory and had mirr= ors > of qemu up to 0.6.1 - I'm trying this with 0.6.2 - so did you have to app= ly > any of those patches in there to get it to work with 0.6.1 ? >=20 > thx !