From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DWsAg-0001Id-Bl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:38:55 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DWs6j-0000C1-VA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:34:52 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWs48-0007y2-4F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:32:08 -0400
Received: from [64.233.184.194] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DWs6i-0004Iv-Se
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:34:49 -0400
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so932989wra
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 14 May 2005 01:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46d6db660505140127315ed167@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 10:27:31 +0200
From: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Old DOS under Qemu
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.05.13.14.34.57.626555@free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <000501c55689$3e137ce0$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e>
	<46d6db6605051200137f70e466@mail.gmail.com>
	<000a01c5570f$37951410$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e>
	<46d6db6605051211123ec1117a@mail.gmail.com>
	<003301c55738$a30d7380$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e>
	<pan.2005.05.13.14.34.57.626555@free.fr>
Reply-To: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 5/13/05, Ronald <daimon55@free.fr> wrote:
> > I'm already using the latest FreeOSZoo windows build.
>=20
> This doesn't mean that it perform like Christian's or Kazu's one, you can
>  get a try.
>=20

Actually I performed some comparisons yesterday using nbench on
a qemu linux guest on winxp host, and in terms of speed, my version is
as good, not better, than FreeOSZoo.

What I don't understand is why qemu on XP host is performing better than
qemu on linux host (without kqemu of course...). Qemu on xp is around 2 or
3x faster. Am I doing something wrong here ?

Christian