From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DdnQc-000280-28 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 06:59:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DdnQT-00026K-St for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 06:59:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DdnQR-00024i-1d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 06:59:47 -0400 Received: from [64.233.184.195] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DdnNV-0004MO-GJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 06:56:45 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so861700wra for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 03:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46d6db6605060203536fd32a71@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:53:10 +0200 From: Christian MICHON Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Hand written code generator #2 In-Reply-To: <200505311623.28508.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200505311623.28508.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: Christian MICHON , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paul, on mingw32/x86-XP host, I see no difference on benchs with i386-softmmu. You mentionned around 30% improvements. Any special compiler flags to use, or compiler version? I applied the patch on a fresh 0.7.0 version. Christian On 5/31/05, Paul Brook wrote: > I've made available a new version of my hand-written code generator for q= emu. > The patch is getting rather large, so I've put it on a web server to avoi= d > spamming the list: > https://nowt.dyndns.org/patch.qemu_qop.gz >=20 > In principle it's very similar to the previous patch. The main difference= is > that it now supports all target architectures, including 64-bit targets. >