From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DuQb7-0008Dw-3M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 04:03:33 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DuQaz-0008CT-Ia
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 04:03:27 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DuQax-0008Bj-8y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 04:03:24 -0400
Received: from [64.233.182.198] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DuQem-0004QY-RM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 04:07:21 -0400
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n15so235175nfc
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46d6db6605071800583fffb0f1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:58:07 +0200
From: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] x86 FPU Emulation
In-Reply-To: <BAY101-F471FBC2CF0ECA646E9F5ACCD20@phx.gbl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <BAY101-F471FBC2CF0ECA646E9F5ACCD20@phx.gbl>
Reply-To: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I see the same problems on bartpe (XP winpe compatible).
By the way, on XP (guest or host), you need to type
calc387 2^^4.

But I've tested other software, notably 3D images raytracers,
using FP operations. No such problems. Images look good.
Yet I guess I should do a pixel per pixel comparison to
check any truncation.

Another possibility would be to compile the asm of  calc387
on linux to check the values.

Christian

On 7/17/05, The Qube <qube99@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Using any DOS/DOS-like setup under qemu x86 (no kqemu/qvm86) and running
> calc387 will produce non-sane results.  For example, "calc387 2^4" produc=
es
> 17.7635.  "calc387 4^2" produces 17.7635 as well.  I've verified this is =
not
> an issue with calc387 by  running the above two calculations under dosbox
> 0.63 with the dynamic core and geting "16" back for both..  I've test thi=
s
> on an Athlon XP system.  runcom doesn't work with calc387, so qemu-i386
> isn't testable.
>=20
> calc387's homepage (near the bottom): http://www.geocities.com/craig_hess=
el/
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>=20


--=20
Christian