From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dvc1N-0004gY-8p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:27:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dvc1L-0004fm-Ge
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:27:32 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dvbtx-00031s-TY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:19:53 -0400
Received: from [64.233.182.199] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DvbaH-0003dc-8R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:59:33 -0400
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n15so37080nfc
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46d6db66050721064935c22f61@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:49:34 +0200
From: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Can you commit the pcnet patch ?
In-Reply-To: <200507211419.51421.paul@codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <42DE282A.3080102@linbox.com>
	<20050721072943.GA24642@tuxedo.skovlyporten.dk>
	<200507211419.51421.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I tried using pxe (at least the probe) to get more diagnostics
regarding this pcnet failure.

Based on the windows host patches I posted earlier on, I get
this message:

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Probing pci nic...
[lancepci]pcnet32.c: Found lancepci, Vendor=3D0x1022 Device=3D0x2000
lancepci: 52:54:00:12:34:56 at ioaddr C020, No MII tranceiver found!
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

This apparently tells the hw emulation is incomplete. When using
realtek, I do not get this tranceiver message.

If I try to boot win95 guest with "-nic-pcnet -nics 2", I finally get an IP
thru the DHCP, but the network does not work.

The patch needs badly some update/improvement on the windows side.
Any specialist around? I'm puzzled, not being an expert in this field.

Christian