From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DxKXq-000352-Ix for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:12:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DxKXD-00031n-Nh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:11:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DxKX3-0002dA-7W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:11:23 -0400 Received: from [64.233.182.197] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DxKFq-0002fv-Ki for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:53:34 -0400 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n15so146989nfc for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46d6db66050726004221d19ae6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:42:29 +0200 From: Christian MICHON Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU release 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <5640213305072521352b61b33b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42E4017A.6000002@bellard.org> <5640213305072521352b61b33b@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Christian MICHON , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 7/26/05, Mike Tremoulet wrote: > Outstanding work! I've been a fan of QEMU as a free emulator for some ti= me. >=20 > The changelog mentions that the KQEMU accelerator is now available as > a preliminary executable for Windows. I've not been able to find a > link to that version anywhere. Should I pull down the sources and > compile on my Linux machine, or is there a pre-compiled version about? >=20 How could I miss this from the Changelog. Shame on me :) The kqemu 0.7.1 download link is on qemu homepage. I did not manage to compile a newer kqemu.sys, so I used the binary inside the archive directly. It works and **rocks**. The ravi-demo (winosi) shows inside win2k3 guest a 10x improvement in refresh rate (2.56fps vs ~29fps). Inside a linux guest, linux 2.6.10 compilation takes now 4 minutes. Used to be more than 20 minutes without kqemu. So apparently kqemu on windows host now works. Bravo Fabrice. Cool achievement :) Thanks again. Christian