* [Qemu-devel] some benchmarks on windows hosts
@ 2005-07-28 9:05 Christian MICHON
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Christian MICHON @ 2005-07-28 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Just wanted to share some preliminary results
Aim= to compare on WinXP hosts qemu+kqemu 0.7.1
with Serenity Virtual Station (svista)
Settings= both vm use 128M RAM + 256M HDD/COW
Guest= slaxpro iso
Benchmarks= boot time, untarring kernel, compile kernel
Time is measured in real time, not in vm time. :)
Results:
======
boot time -> 34s (qemu) 42s (svista)
untarring -> 102s (qemu) 83s (svista)
compile -> 230s (qemu) 247s (svista)
3 remarks out of this experiment:
1) qemu cdrom emulation is faster than svista
(I've other testbenches showing it: bartpe for ex)
2) qemu hdd could be faster (kqemu doesn't improve this)
(it seems the old hdd udma patches never made it inside CVS)
3) speed of calculation is faster now with qemu+kqemu
( I read somewhere that on Windows, only Svista was a real
competitor to VmWare supremacy. Apparently now qemu is
a good challenger too)
--
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-07-28 9:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-28 9:05 [Qemu-devel] some benchmarks on windows hosts Christian MICHON
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).