From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dy8ZB-0005kS-Ex
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:36:53 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dy8Z3-0005fd-Hv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:36:45 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dy8Z3-0005dT-Au
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:36:45 -0400
Received: from [64.233.182.204] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dy8cp-0005XL-T5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:40:40 -0400
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n15so109081nfc
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46d6db66050728062933facb30@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:29:03 +0200
From: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KQEMU on Win32 (+patch)
In-Reply-To: <a0ea166505072806183bcc3327@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <42E804E2.8000605@reactos.com> <42E827D9.5060609@dblab.ece.ntua.gr>
	<42E8A4D3.40700@reactos.com>
	<a0ea1665050728032435143526@mail.gmail.com>
	<46d6db6605072805302a55c777@mail.gmail.com>
	<a0ea166505072806183bcc3327@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

found out why :)

On 7/28/05, 姚春林 wrote:
(...)
> debian + gnome 2.1 
> gnome is slow . and vmware with 256mem is more faster then qemu. 

answer is: gnome usage. Bad idea, which ever is your emulator.
Try to go for lighter window manager environment, like fluxbox.

Try also to boot in framebuffer mode, in 800x600x16bpp. I noticed
this mode is quite fast :)

I think there are some patches to try to improve the cirrus emulated.
But I haven't seen any updated for a long time.

Christian