From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EKhgu-0007pl-5C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:34:08 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EKhgo-0007oI-Ku
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:34:04 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKhgo-0007mu-Az
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:34:02 -0400
Received: from [64.233.182.207] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EKhem-0000lQ-RL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:31:57 -0400
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a4so18369nfc
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46d6db660509281231671b233b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:31:54 +0200
From: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46d6db6605092214567b1611f2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <46d6db6605092214567b1611f2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Trying to emulate an openmosix cluster
Reply-To: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I managed doing this simulation using Parallels Workstation
(I'm not trying to spam the list here...).

It worked flawlessly, using bridged networking on a dedicated
TAP-like network device...

My point is the following: today 2 qemu guests with dedicated
macaddr cannot share the same TAP-win32 v8 adapter.

The software I mentionned above doesn't have similar limitation.
Would it be feasible to change the current tap/win32 patch to
overcome qemu's current limitation, and where to start ?

Christian

On 9/22/05, Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com> wrote:
(...)
> Guests are openmosix linux nodes done by:
> http://www.purehacking.com/chaos/iso/chaos-1.6.iso
(...)