Re: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark?

["Christian MICHON" <christian.michon@gmail.com>]

how can we do the same if the host is winXP ?

Today, on linux guests, 2.4.x kernel boot faster than 2.6.x kernel
inside qemu (unless using "clock=pit" on 2.6.x). 2 days ago,
when I tried to setup Solaris x86 10 guest inside winXP host, I
gave up since the timing engine inside the guest seems slow.

I would really like to know how to solve this on XP hosts.
Thanks,


On 5/16/06, Kazu <kazoo@r3.dion.ne.jp> wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> As I have reported before, it seems that on my host linux system kqemu
> does
> >> not work with guest win98se.
> >>
> >> Is there any benchmark that I could run in the guest, with and without
> kqemu,
> >> to check if this is so objectively? (Ideally I'd like two benchmarks -
> 16-bit
> >> and 32-bit code).
> >>
> >
> > The vast majority of guest benchmarking programs are going to give you
> > invalid results.  The clock within QEMU (rdtsc and wall clock) are not
> > very reliable and this is going to skew the results.
> >
>
> If you set /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq to 1024 and disable cpuspeed
> service that is related to SpeedStep/PowerNow! on a host OS, the clock in
> guest OS works fine.
>
> I checked it on i686/x86_64 Linux host.
>
> Regards,
> Kazu
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>


-- 
Christian