From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FnD9b-0000gt-GV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:21:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FnD9Z-0000fK-UN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:21:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnD9Z-0000f8-NL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:21:49 -0400 Received: from [64.233.162.206] (helo=nz-out-0102.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FnDGi-0008NH-0Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:29:12 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id z3so933286nzf for ; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 04:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46d6db660606050421y77a65b4ehe253dba7ff8a799e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:21:48 +0200 From: "Christian MICHON" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] yet another proposed solution for gcc 4.x In-Reply-To: <20060604160228.GA26124@tapir.sajinet.com.pe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060604085935.GB24853@tapir.sajinet.com.pe> <200606041246.07373.paul@codesourcery.com> <20060604160228.GA26124@tapir.sajinet.com.pe> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 6/4/06, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > PS. eventhough it wasn't the cleanest build, gcc-4.1.1 when used to build > everything but op.c resulted in working binaries on my gentoo 2006.0 amd64 > system. did you get better benchmark results than using gcc-3.x ? -- Christian