From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GvLdN-00072h-KT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:34:29 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GvLdJ-0006z1-7I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:34:26 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GvLdJ-0006yx-2O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:34:25 -0500
Received: from [64.233.184.229] (helo=wr-out-0506.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GvLdJ-0006qc-44
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:34:25 -0500
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 58so514298wri
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <46d6db660612151434k502de652m91658b2e3b451fab@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:34:22 +0100
From: "Christian MICHON" <christian.michon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu speed vs vmplayer?
In-Reply-To: <200612152218.12733.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <10541fa50612130009s798a1587n4a3d2b8b51baa334@mail.gmail.com>
	<200612152138.58994.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<46d6db660612151348w542e05daq75e5c1eab6539cb6@mail.gmail.com>
	<200612152218.12733.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 12/15/06, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> QEMU is an open source project (and this list is hosted on a site that is
> explicitly for open source projects)=B7 Thus any solution that involves
> proprietary closed source modules is offtopic.
>

ok, politically incorrect. point taken :)

yet, what about the second part of my reply ?

Is qvm86 still active ? if yes, great. if no, what do you need to restart i=
t ?
(else than dedicated developpers, of course). As far as I can see, no
qvm86 check-in for 15 months now...

--=20
Christian