From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2PHl-0005RQ-Jr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:53:22 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2PHj-0005QS-Ef for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:53:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2PHi-0005Px-LR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:53:18 -0500 Received: from [66.249.92.175] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H2PHi-0002K9-7L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:53:18 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so5155228ugd for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:53:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <46d6db660701040153o5e1ee5e9o86393b1659f80e24@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:53:17 +0100 From: "Christian MICHON" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] USB EHCI development nearing completion In-Reply-To: <200701040945.l049j3dY027801@fozzy.burkley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200612272134.16779.paul@codesourcery.com> <200701040945.l049j3dY027801@fozzy.burkley.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I tested it on win32 host. Apparently a typo mistake (see updated patch) how to use it ? diff -Nur ehci.patch ehci-xian.patch --- ehci.patch Thu Jan 4 09:50:17 2007 +++ ehci-xian.patch Thu Jan 4 10:40:26 2007 @@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ + printf ("buffer is %p (+%d)\n", s->buffer, (uint8_t*)s->buffer - (uint8_t*)s); + + pci_conf = s->dev.config; -+ pci_conf[0x00] = 0x86 ++ pci_conf[0x00] = 0x86; + pci_conf[0x01] = 0x80; // Intel VID + pci_conf[0x02] = 0x55; + pci_conf[0x03] = 0x55; // Made up product ID On 1/4/07, Mark B wrote: > > Paul, > > I don't see anything to do with EHCI in Chromium. I was just referring to > the 3D patch as an example - maybe this is causing confusion. > > Did anyone else get a chance to look at the EHCI emulation patch? > > Thanks, > > Mark > -- Christian